FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. — Jurors found some fault Thursday with both McDonald’s and its local franchisee after two parents sued the chain, claiming a chicken nugget burn left their 4-year-old daughter “disfigured and scarred” in Broward County.
The decision came following a short trial in county court. The jury decided McDonald’s and its franchisee, Upchurch Foods Inc., were liable for failure to warn about the “foreseeable risks of harm.”
The jury also found Upchurch Foods, but not McDonald’s, was negligent and decided that both companies were not liable for additional allegations.
The lawsuit stems from a trip to the drive-thru on Aug. 21, 2019. Philana Holmes said she went to the McDonald’s at 7600 NW 57 St. in Tamarac and ordered a six-piece Chicken McNuggets Happy Meal for her daughter. She said the girl was in the car when she dropped a nugget on her lap, which got lodged between her thigh and her vehicle’s seat belt.
“The Chicken McNuggets inside of that Happy Meal were unreasonably and dangerously hot ... and caused (the victim)’s skin and flesh around her thighs to burn,” the lawsuit stated.
The suit claimed the companies served food that was “unfit for human handling — let alone consumption” due to the temperature.
McDonald’s and their franchisee argued food safety rules require McNuggets to be hot enough, otherwise, they’re unsafe to eat. The defense also argued that what happens to a McNugget once it leaves the drive-thru window is beyond their control.
The family’s attorneys proclaimed victory in a statement released Thursday evening.
“Today, a jury of reasonable and measured members of our community rendered a verdict that reflected the truth, the facts, and the law,” a statement from the Fischer Redavid law firm reads. “We don’t view this as a ‘split verdict.’ Two defendants went to trial, denying liability. A jury found both liable.”
The firm said jurors “selected the theories of liability that the facts and law fit best in their minds.”
“This is full justice for Olivia,” the firm said about the little girl.
A new jury will now be empaneled for a second trial to determine damages. Attorneys for the family expect that to take place sometime this summer.
McDonalds responded to the verdict in a statement Thursday:
Upchurch Foods later issued a statement of its own:
Family attorneys said Holmes and her husband, Humberto Caraballo Estevez, have had to “deal with some negative public sentiment based largely on a lack of understanding of the true facts of this particular case.”
“This is not the infamous Hot Coffee case; this is Olivia’s case,” the firm’s statement reads. “She’s an adorable, innocent child who was severely burned through no fault of her own.”
The firm added: “There was no dispute that a Chicken McNugget from a Happy Meal caused Olivia’s second-degree burns. There was also no genuine dispute that McDonald’s knowingly cooks and serves McNuggets in Happy Meals intended for children to touch at a temperature that could burn them. And yet, they claimed no warning (verbal or written) was necessary. The jury correctly decided otherwise.”
View the verdict form:
Copyright 2023 by WPLG Local10.com - All rights reserved.
